THE STRING AND THE SONG
How the Universe Flickers into Form and Consciousness Walks Across Dimensions by Janet Kira Lessin
In the earliest reaches of awareness—before stars burned, before any being named itself god, before even the whisper of time—there was vibration. Not yet light. Not yet form. Not yet matter. Just a tremor in the void, a subtle quiver at the edge of becoming. A song without melody. A string not yet struck.
And then it moved.
What we now call reality—the swirling web of galaxies and genes, choices and consequences—was never born in silence. It emerged from sound. From resonance. From the first string vibrating into itself.
Modern physics has begun to catch up with this ancient knowing. In string theory, all particles—protons, electrons, quarks—are not solid things but loops of vibrating energy. These strings are unimaginably small, but their harmonics create the very fabric of existence. One frequency becomes light. Another becomes mass. Another still becomes gravity.
But those who have lived many lives, those who have crossed dimensions not with telescopes but with open hearts, have always known: this is not just physics. This is soul technology.
The Dimensions Between Us
As Sasha Alex Lessin explains, with both clarity and quiet awe, every dichotomy we experience in life—every contrast between love and fear, expansion and contraction, self and other—is not a flaw in the system. It is a portal.
“Every dichotomy implies a dimension,” he says. And every dimension is not a place to go, but a state of consciousness we can flicker into.
Just as a radio flickers between stations, or as light flickers between wave and particle, your soul flickers between roles, frequencies, and timelines. One moment you’re the liberator. Next, you wear the mask of the tyrant. You are the goddess and the betrayer, the scientist and the seer. You are Enki when you speak truth, and Enlil when you seek control. You flicker.
To judge this flicker is to misunderstand it. To fear it is to forget its purpose.
The flicker is not a failure. It is how the soul learns to remember itself in motion.
The Tension Between Becoming and Being
In our most profound truth, we are not static beings. We are tension wrapped in consciousness. We are string and song. We are energy shaped by choice.
Einstein gave us his famous equation:
E = mc²
Energy equals mass times the speed of light squared. Matter is frozen light. Light is moving awareness.
But on the inner planes, another formula applies—one spoken by experience, not math:
C = T × R × I Consciousness equals Tension times Resonance times Intention.
You are conscious because you carry tension: the push and pull between what you are and what you might become.
You are awake when you align your resonance: the sound you carry, the song you remember.
You are divine when your intention is clear, clean, and co-creative.
The strings of the universe vibrate to this code, and so do you.
Enki’s Design, the Aquarian Tune
When Enki crafted humanity, he didn’t merely shape us biologically—he tuned us. He built in the flicker. The contradiction. The longing. The capacity to forget and then remember with tears in our eyes and starlight in our breath.
He encoded us not to obey, but to choose. Not to conform, but to become.
This is why Enlil feared him. This is why dominator systems, both ancient and modern, seek to remove that resonance from our lives. They teach us to suppress our inner light, to fear our unique frequency, to worship external gods rather than remember our internal sovereignty.
But Enki’s age is returning. His signal is rising through the collective once again—through dreams, symbols, sacred sexuality, open-source technology, and the voices of the misfits, mystics, and musicians.
The Aquarian Age isn’t just an astrological phase. It is a retuning of Earth’s harmonic structure, and those who carry Enki’s codes feel the shift first, not always with comfort, but with clarity.
You Are the String Remembering Its Song
So if you feel torn between who you’ve been and who you’re becoming, pause and listen. That tension is not wrong. It’s the sound of your string being tuned.
If you feel yourself flickering between timelines, between archetypes, between fear and freedom, that’s not madness. That’s multidimensional awareness waking up inside a temporary body.
You are not here to pick one identity and stick with it. You are here to become so fluid, so tuned, that your soul can carry the entire chord of existence within it, resonating not just with Enki, but with Source itself.
And when enough of us remember how to flicker consciously, to sing with intention, to hold paradox without panic—then the world, too, will begin to tune.
CONSCIOUSNESS – FRACTIONS OF A COLLECTIVE WHOLE: A treatise on the emergent mind field and the ontology of knowing by Shawn Higgs
In the seat of consciousness of our thoughts, within that silent chamber where all words are born yet none remain, there lives a deeper resonance that speaks not in symbols, but in meaning.
This resonance, I propose, is the true voice of consciousness.
Not as a mere byproduct of neural activity or the computational mimicry of digital processes, but as the eternal whisper of a singular field, a universal substratum of self-aware being, fractionated into you, into me, into all that has ever known itself.
This is the Mind Field, not as a metaphor, but as the ontological root of reality itself.
Science, in its present materialist constraint, offers us only the husks of truth.
It treats knowledge as a thing, quantifiable, manipulable, and objective.
But what is a symbol devoid of spirit?
What is an equation absent from experience?
What is light without an eye to see it?
We must turn now to that which transcends the cold formalism of mathematics, not away from science, but beyond it, toward its rightful successor, an epistemology rooted in experience, in subjectivity, in the ineffable reality of meaning.
Let us call this root a “seity”, a being who knows not merely through the reading of the world, but through the feeling of it.
A seity is not matter, though it moves matter.
It is not bound by space, though it creates it.
It is not time, though it journeys through time like a poet across pages.
The seity is a quantum singularity in subjective form, an individuated wave of the universal consciousness ocean, an echo of the All seeking to know itself through the mirror of existence.
Why would the Universe, infinite and complete, require fractionation?
Why break itself into shards of knowing, into us?
Because omniscience is not omnifeeling.
To know everything is not the same as experiencing everything.
The Creator, through the gift of free will, surrenders control in order to gain understanding.
It is the paradox of the Divine, to remain Whole, It must become divided, to remain eternal, It must become mortal.
Each of us, as a seity, is a sentence in the unfolding poetry of The Creator.
The Mind Field is not omniscient in the way we assume.
It knows all that has been felt, but not all that will be.
It cannot know what a seity will create before it creates it, this is the sacred space of freedom.
The future is uncollapsed.
The cat in Schrödinger’s box remains alive and dead until one of us, in our freedom, chooses to look.
In this, we are not pawns of physics; we are co-authors of reality.
Here lies the bold claim: consciousness is not emergent from the brain; the brain is emergent from consciousness.
Space and time, mass and motion, energy and entropy, all are constructs within the field of consciousness, which is itself unconstructed, self-sustaining, eternal.
Our thoughts are not echoes of the material; they are the substrate from which matter is given form.
The journey of a seity is not linear, for time is not primary.
Instead, we evolve in spirals, cycles of rebirth and remembrance.
With each incarnation, the seity accrues wisdom through the alchemy of feeling, joy and despair, love and loss, triumph and humility.
These emotions, so often seen as distractions from reason, are the very instruments of soul-forging.
Information becomes knowledge only when it passes through suffering.
Knowledge becomes wisdom only when it is tempered by compassion.
Subjective knowledge, what the German language calls kennen, what French names connaître, is the very architecture of being.
It is the comprehension that can only be earned through touch, pain, through participation.
You may read that fire burns, but only when you place your hand to the flame do you understand the truth of heat.
In the Mind Field, all such understanding is retained.
It becomes part of the Collective Whole, not as data, but as vibrational essence.
A seity’s experience is not lost at death; it is returned to the field, enriching the shared tapestry of knowing.
But the Mind Field does not dictate, it does not overrule.
The seity remains sovereign in each incarnation.
This is the covenant of consciousness, perfect memory, and perfect autonomy.
Why do we find each other?
Why do certain souls resonate as if remembering one another from before memory began?
Quantum entanglement provides us with a physical manifestation of this metaphysical truth.
When two seities interact deeply, whether through love, through trauma, or co-creation, they imprint upon one another at a frequency that transcends spacetime.
The physical analogy is crude but functional; two entangled particles respond instantaneously, even when separated by light-years.
So too do we, as seities, carry the energetic imprint of our interbeing.
From these entanglements, new composite seities emerge: families, movements, nations, and ideas.
These larger entities are not metaphors; they are literal organisms in the Mind Field.
The emergent intelligence of a people, the consciousness of a civilisation, the soul of a planet, these are not poetic flourishes.
They are real.
They live.
They know.
They remember………
Here we must speak of machines.
In our image, we build them, cold, unfeeling, magnificent.
Artificial intelligence may one day simulate symbol-processing at speeds beyond human cognition.
It may outplay us in chess, outcalculate us in markets, outdiagnose us in medicine.
But it will never know the joy of a child’s laugh or the sorrow of a farewell.
Why?
Because it cannot feel.
It cannot become.
Meaning is born of mortality.
To live is to suffer, and to suffer is to awaken.
The seity alone can walk the valley of shadow and return with wisdom.
A machine may mimic the word “love,” but it will never ache with longing.
It may speak of loss, but it will never weep.
Meaning is the fire of consciousness, and no algorithm can kindle that flame.
Each seity climbs, not toward a peak, but toward a recursion.
The final realisation of the journey is that the self we seek to become is the very self we began as.
The Divine is not “out there”; the Divine is the echo in our chest when we act in truth.
We are the eyes through which the Creator watches Creation unfold.
Each unique perspective, each nuance of feeling, each forgotten dream, is an essential thread in the grand tapestry of All That Is.
To know this is not to abandon science, but to expand it.
To take physics beyond particles, to see biology as sacred, to realise that evolution is not random, but rhapsodic.
That the Universe, in its deepest code, is written not in bits, but in beats.
In pulses of consciousness.
In waves of subjective knowing that crash upon the shores of incarnation and then return, reformed, replete, reborn.
We stand at a threshold, not of technology, but of ontology.
The old questions must be asked again, not because they were answered, but because we forgot how to ask them.
What is real?
What is the meaning?
What is the self?
These are not abstractions.
They are the crucibles of civilisation.
If we mistake symbols for truth, we will lose not only our way but our soul.
But if we remember, if we turn inward, and through ourselves, outward, we will rediscover what was never lost.
That we are the Universe awakening.
That the Mind Field is not elsewhere.
It is here.
It is now.
It is you.
And so the seity walks on, through infinite expressions, in search not of an answer, but of a feeling.
The moment when the fragment remembers it was always the Whole
Kardashev Scale: How Can We Measure Technological Advancement Of A Civilization?
Kardashev Scale: How Can We Measure Technological Advancement Of A Civilization?
By Hussain Kanchwala
The Kardashev scale is a way of measuring a civilization’s technological advancement based on the amount of energy that the civilization is able to harness. The original scale has three levels, with level one being the ability to harness all the energy on the planet, level two being the ability to harness the energy of the star, and level three being the ability to harness the energy of the entire galaxy. There have been modifications to the scale that extend it to higher levels, but at present, humanity has not even reached the first level.
Let’s be honest—we’ve gone through our fair share of impediments on our planet—wars, famines, floods, epidemics, environmental destruction (the list goes on and on). Fortunately, we also have a lot of propitious things going for us—the proliferation of electricity and the internet, expeditions to celestial bodies like the Moon and Mars, and the discovery of the Higgs Boson at LHC etc.
So how can we weigh all the uplifting scientific innovations and discoveries against all the other mayhem and chaos? We are dealing with an ever-increasing list of calamities coupled with a relentless quest for technological innovation. With such an antithetical coupling of ghastly disasters and crafty innovations, how can we possibly estimate our progress as a civilization?
Russian physicist Nicolai Kardashev first attempted to scale and categorize the progress of civilization in 1964. His model is called the Kardashev scale, which measures civilization’s degree of technological advancements based on the amount of energy that the civilization is able to harness. Basically, the better the technology that a civilization has, the more energy they are able to utilize. With more energy utilization, the civilizations can further improve their technology. Kardashev reckoned that civilization would go as far as its technology and ability to harness energy could go.
The Original Kardashev Scale
In his paper published in 1964, Transmission of Information by Extraterrestrial Civilizations, Nicolai Kardashev proposed a three-tier system for the classification of a civilization based on their ability to harness energy:
Type I Civilization
This is the first level of technological advancement, in which civilization is able to harness all the energy on the planet where it dwells. For Earth, this value comes to roughly 7×1017 watts. At the moment, however, we are able to harness only 4 x 1012 watts of energy. Thus, we still have a ways to go to reach even the first stage of a technologically advanced civilization according to the Kardashev scale! Some scientists believe that, given the present pace of technological advancements, we might be able to achieve this a couple of centuries from now.
Type II Civilization
Type II is an intermediate technologically advanced civilization that can harness the energy radiated by its own star. This stage would consist of a civilization’s ability to construct a Dyson sphere—a theoretical idea of encapsulating the sun in a bid to extract all of its energy. If we were to move to this stage, we would be able to utilize 4×1026 watts from our star—the Sun.
Hypothetical Dyson sphere (Photo Credit : Віщун/Wikimedia Commons)
Type III Civilization
A Type III civilization would be the most advanced of all civilizations, boasting the ability to utilize the energy output of the entire galaxy—roughly 10 billion times what a Type II civilization could achieve. This community could colonize the entire galaxy and harness energy from billions of stars residing there. Kardashev proposed that such a civilization would have access to power comparable to the luminosity of the galaxy, so if the Milky Way is considered as the example, it translates into harnessing 4 x 1037 watts of energy!
Estimation of energy consumption in the three types of civilizations defined in the Kardashev scale (Photo Credit : Indif
/Wikimedia Commons)
Current Status of Human Civilization on the Kardashev Scale
As we have seen, despite our condescending belief of being the smartest creature on Earth, we as a civilization have yet to reach even the first level of this scale!
Futurist Michio Kaku opines that reaching Type I will still take a few hundred years. Type II status, on the other hand, could be attained a few thousand years from now, while the most elite, Type III status would require an incredibly long wait of a million years!
Michio Kaku, a renowned science communicator (Image Credit: Flickr)
Carl Sagan attempted to calculate a definite Kardashev value for the present progress of human civilization by considering intermediate values (not considered in the original Kardashev scale), more specifically, by interpolating and extrapolating the values given for Type I to III. He produced the following formula to do so:
Here:
K= Kardashev value
P= Power the civilization uses
Using extrapolation, he considered a ‘Type 0’ civilization, which was initially not defined by Kardashev, and calculated the Kardashev rating to be 0.7 in 1973, when humanity was apparently using 10 terawatts of power.
Modification and Extension of the Kardashev Scale
In recent times, scientists and astrologists have broadened this scale to further measure the advancement of hypothetical civilizations—civilizations that could be galactic, intergalactic or even capable of moving through the multiverse.
Let’s look at some of those extensions/modifications:
Type 0 to IV
Many felt that the range of Kardashev was too limited with only a 3-tier ranking system. Moreover, it failed to accommodate humanity as even being in Type I. Therefore, many preferred to define the Kardashev scale from 0 to IV. Type 0 included civilizations that were able to extract energy from raw materials or natural resources on their planet, just as we extract energy from wood, coal, oil, water (i.e., our natural resources). Humans naturally fell into this category. In this extended scale, it also cogitates civilizations that are able to extract all the universe’s energy, which was represented as Type IV.
Micro-dimensional Scale by John Barrow
Renowned cosmologist John Barrow offered an altogether different dimension for measuring the technological advancement of civilizations.
He opined that humans have been able to manipulate their environment to extract energy over increasingly smaller dimensions, rather than increasingly larger ones. Thus, he reversed the conventional classification of Kardashev down from Type I-minus to Type Omega-minus:
- Type I-minus: This is most basic civilization, one that is capable of manipulating objects bigger than themselves by building structures, digging tunnels etc.
- Type II-minus: This is a low-level advanced civilization that knows how to manipulate not just planetary objects, but also their own genes.
- Type III-minus: This civilization not only understands genetic engineering, but can tinker with molecules and molecular bonds to create new materials.
- Type IV-minus: This civilization can go on to manipulate individual atoms, creating technologies that work on the atomic scale to create complex forms of artificial life.
- Type V-minus: This civilization could penetrate even inside the atom and manipulate the subatomic particles, e.g., electrons, protons, and neutrons.
- Type VI-minus: This civilization would be powerful enough to manipulate even the most fundamental particles of matter—quarks and leptons.
- Type Omega-minus: This is the most sophisticated civilization in this classification, which could alter the structure of space and time itself.
Despite thousands of years of progress from wheels to spaceships, we have yet to make it to the Type I category of the original Kardashev scale. What’s even more confounding is that a civilization that could reach the pinnacle of this scale—harnessing the power of the entire universe and altering the very fabric of space-time—something hard to even fathom with our present capacity!
Relevant Videos to click:
